Tracking code caldwell guardian

Saturday, May 29, 2010

Caldwell Mayor Nancolas "never received the messages", 911 Dispatch Issues Reach Emergency Levels

Caldwell Mayor Garret Nancolas is once again clueless in Caldwell regarding a pressing budget issue.

This time around it is over the terms and conditions in a letter sent to Mayor Nancolas on January 4, 2010 regarding County costs for  combined city/county 911 dispatch operations. Sheriff Smith appears to be going for the brass ring on this as well by billing Caldwell property taxpayers $518,633.19 for dispatch services.  Commissioners and the Sheriff finally gave up on trying to get a response from the Mayor. Mayor Nancolas was sent a formal letter dated January 4th, 2010 regarding County  911 dispatch costs and a proposal to share the $1.5MM costs of the dispatch center. (public records indicate Canyon County will receive on the order of $1.3MM for phone surcharges under e-911 collections this fiscal year)

Here's the deal gleaned from public records:

 Back in 2001 the City and County formally agreed to combine 911 dispatch services to the benefit of all city and county residents and taxpayers. When Caldwell built the new police station, the county would get all the e-911 surcharges from Caldwell you see on phone/telecom bills you get each month. The city would not build a new dispatch center and save money on the construction and costs of a new 911 dispatch center.

In the original agreement page 5, item #3, "If COUNTY seeks contributions from the users of CCSO's dispatch services, CITY shall negotiate with the COUNTY, in good faith, an amendment to this Agreement for contributions by the CITY to the COUNTY for the operation of CCSO"S dispatch services center."

A meeting was held with Mayor Nancolas, the CCBOC, and a cast of other 911 players on February 8th,2010. Commissioner Ferdinand said Mayor Nancolas was given a letter dated January 4th, 2010 regarding budget issues where the county hasn't been charging for dispatch services.

"Mayor Nancolas said the only time he heard anything about the budget issues was after receiving the letter. He also said he wished the board had not sent the letter. Commissioner Rule said he called Mayor Nancolas a couple of times over the last two weeks and didn't receive a call back. Mayor Nancolas said he never received the messages."

(The response from Mayor Nancolas is a pretty much stock answer when he is confronted with facts. He can plead ignorance of the topic and download this communication failure onto "the best staff Caldwell has ever had." If he, in fact, did not receive word of Commissioner Rule's repeated efforts to contact him, then he should consider replacing his secretarial staff for incompetence.)

Councilman and former Caldwell Chief of Police, Bob Sobba was at the February meeting. Mr. Sobba reminded everyone it was the county's choice in 2001 not to receive fees for personnel costs. A 20 year upgrade project on 911 communications equipment is now completed due to the agreement to combine 911 services.  Now the county wants to change terms of the deal per item #3 in the origianl agreement signed by all the parties to the resolution.

We are in an economy leaving all taxing entities scrambling to collect all the cash they can from every source possible. Dispatch personnel costs to the county are $1,524,047.00 for fiscal 2009.  Sheriff Smith and Commishes now want to download 33.3% of dispatch personnel costs onto the city of Caldwell over a three year period, despite getting all the e-911 cash from Caldwell.

Caldwell's decision in 2001 to not build a dispatch center was a good faith and very wise decision made by Chief Sobba and Sheriff Nourse. We don't know how much e-911 cash Caldwell generates for the County but with the upgraded dispatch center in place we don't think Caldwell should be on the hook for a full third of the operational costs. The cash generated by e-911 charges given to the county should be a consideration.  Sheriff Smith is reported to not share this view of the e-911 revenues received from Caldwell.

This could deteriorate to Caldwell making a break from the county and starting its own dispatch center again or combining with Nampa or Caldwell and the County coming to a reasonable agreement. In the meantime it appears the Commishes are about to embark on a fee for all services renedered to the cities by the county.  Sort of looks like double taxation from down here in the trenches.  City folks can look forward to tax bills from both the city and the county for stuff if your get what is happening here.

Caldwell residents should be asking why wasn't Mayor Nancolas paying attention to efforts to bring him into the discussions early on in this vital issue? His pleading he didn't receive notification on this matter is "weak sauce" at best and incompetence in discharging the duties and responsibilities of his office on the extreme end.

Mayor Nancolas says his door always open but he is never there and his staff can't seem to get vital information and communications to him in a businesslike manner.  (Meanwhile the city of Caldwell has not yet responded to our public records request in this matter placed earlier this past week.)

More to come as this unfolds and more info is received.

22 comments:

  1. Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't the Mayor sit on UR with Commissioner Rule? Seems to me they would have bumped into each other once or twice while spending our money.

    Maybe the Mayor should check with Eljay. After all, Mr. Waite's the one who runs the city.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Everyone should get off their collective butts and RECALL the Mayor!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey, if you're looking for extra money, why don't you ask Mr. Bujak. He apparently has plenty to go around, to the tune of $30K a month.

    Why haven't we seen a posting about that situation, Paul? Stop brown-nosing the Commishes and ripping on Nancolas for five minutes, and let us know why you're not offended by Mr. Bujak's refusal to turn over what are clearly public records.

    ReplyDelete
  4. good post. interesting subject.

    ReplyDelete
  5. How come then he owes several people hundreds of thousands of dollars on personal notes. A personal note is "below the radar" and does not show up on a credit check.

    ReplyDelete
  6. No lie buckwheat! One person will make it public soon if he doesn't pay up!

    ReplyDelete
  7. L.J. and the mayor both supported Smith against Nourse in the election two years ago. They claimed that Smith was more co-operative than Nourse. I wonder how that is working for them now. They got what they wanted live with it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Smith has ran the cost of his department way up by creating a lot of new LT. and Capt. positions and giving them ten thousand dollar a year raises. Now that money is tight he has to come up with more cash and the city gets the bill.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Them supporting Smith is funny. Smith is saying he is not going to run again so he is not worried about their support for another run. He has them bent over and now is sticking it to them to the tune of a half million. How funny is that. What goes around comes around. Be careful for what you wish for you just might get it.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Bujak is another problem for the county he is way over his head in debt drives around in a Mercedes convertible and can't make his payments. I know he owes one individual $130,000. and is not making the payments. So we now have four out of eight elected officials that have either filed bankruptcy or are about to file bankruptcy handling our tax money. It just sort of gives you a warm feeling knowing our tax money is in such good hands.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Mr. Bujak now has a citizen suit to produce the contract with nampa and the county. The question is how much is getting siphoned off ,if any, into Mr. Bujak's personal hands. Nobody knows for sure. Meanwhile we will all have to wait it out until the courts sort this out.

    If all of this is simply a matter of pass through costs and he is paying himself nothing then there is no cause for complaint other than the oddity of the arrangement.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Paul, How about the lack of transparency? So the taxpayers should just stand by while taxpayer money is being used as part of a shell game?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Oddity! That is a an understatement if there ever was one. Why in heck would the PA even want to do that in the first place. I have talked to a couple of attorneys and they have said the way Bujak has set this deal up,is more than just fishy,

    ReplyDelete
  14. I cannot find the Bujak story posted on the Idaho Press-tribune website. I wonder why that is? I looked in the 7 day archive, etc. Can anyone find it and post it? I only heard about it, but can't seem to find it on the paper's website.

    ReplyDelete
  15. a mole in the tribune...

    ReplyDelete
  16. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  17. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  18. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  19. the last few comments were deleted as they were getting personal and not part of the thread.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Please ! We all saw it Paul! Your buddy was getting personal. Bill Kept it civil. You just don't like being proven wrong. He showed you Smith has less command staff than Good ol Georgie did and caught you in a lie! How's it feel getting caught in another whopper? How many is that now? Three? Four? Five? I will get back to you on that. Ha ha ha busted !

    ReplyDelete
  21. Caldwell and Canyon County are really divided. Jake shows that.

    ReplyDelete

A public discourse on the issues of the day makes the world a better place.

We welcome comments but they will be moderated and edited if too long or do not have anything to do with the post.
Agree or disagree just do it without profanity or it won't get posted. Try to keep your comments to no more than 300 words. Too long and I will try to edit it down or simply delete the comment. The whole idea is to get people to read your comment. Don't use 10 words when one will do the job.

It's OK to have a difference of opinion but keep it civil. I have used the "delete" feature on myself at times.

The ANONYMOUS feature for comments seems to be the most user friendly. People have commented they have difficulty with the other methods of posting comments.